On her first day of questioning by the Senate Judiciary Committee, Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett gave little sense of how she would rule on crucial cases if she is confirmed to the high court. In doing so, she stuck to the time-honored stance of studied reticence, which has been deployed by progressive and conservative nominees alike. 

…read more


Source:: AOL.com

      

(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *