Some Senate Democrats say Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s past writings about how presidents should not be subject to “distracting” lawsuits is problematic as it relates to what might come out of special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation.
Kavanaugh previously wrote in a law review that President Bill Clinton would have been better served not having deal with the Paula Jones sexual harassment case.
WASHINGTON — A group of Senate Democrats want to know more about President Donald Trump’s new Supreme Court justice nominee Brett Kavanaugh, particularly regarding his previous writings on what types of legal scrutiny the commander in chief should be subject to as it relates to anything that might arise from the special counsel investigation led by Robert Mueller.
In 2009, Kavanaugh wrote an article for the Minnesota Law Review describing his belief that US presidents should not be subject to certain probes and lawsuits.
“Having seen first-hand how complex and difficult that job is, I believe it vital that the President be able to focus on his never-ending tasks with as few distractions as possible,” he wrote. “The country wants the President to be ‘one of us’ who bears the same responsibilities of citizenship that all share. But I …read more
Source:: Businessinsider – Politics